|
Excerpt of further issues topics:
Brand Equity and Brand Strategy,
Brand Equity and Brand Diffusion, Brand Equity
and Company Success, Brand Equity and Sales and
Acquisition of Brands or Companies, Brand Equity
and Marketing Investment |
|
Not Private Labels but
„Dual Functionality of Retail“ are the
Underlying Challenge for Traditional
Manufacturer’s Brands
„Private labels“ are the
standard for retailers with a predominant share
of classic brand articles and a full range of
products. Nest to the store brand, which is
mostly positioned next to the price entry level,
the offer is often completed with a product line
whose package design and presentation are more
closely based on brand products. These products
can serve retail in cultivating a profile for
the consumer. A study of PricewaterhouseCoopers
shows the share of private labels in Germany
adds up to about 30%. According to this study
consumers do buy private label products, but
mostly in the lower price range. Nevertheless,
the study also shows that from the point of view
of the consumer the development of store brands
into the premium segment is, by all means,
conceivable.
From the standpoint of the
manufacturer’s brand industry, private labels
are initially simply a competitive product which
manufacturer’s brands have to face up to in an
efficiency contest. Where retail sells private
labels at a relevant extent, this competitive
conflict receives an additional component:
Private labels turn the sales representative
retailer into a competitor at the same time.
The new role perception of retail, making
less use of producing manufacturers, thus taking
on the function of manufacturer, does have
consequences for the world of manufacturer’s
brands. Shelf space of limited availability at
shops has to be allocated anew. As a rule, this
happens at the expense of manufacturer’s brands.
B- and C- brands are removed increasingly from
the retail list. Innovative products are quickly
copied by retail and as such brand management of
manufacturer’s brands is required to act with
even higher effectiveness and efficiency when it
comes to leading its brands.
Where do we
go from here? To generate enough knowledge about
one’s brand is a fundamental basis for a
successful future: One person receives hundreds
of brands messages every day – and maybe
remembers two. For true brands this means they
have to be clearly recognizable and they have to
be tied to a distinct message. It gets difficult
when a brand is excessive. To recognize deficits
early, develop full potential expediently, to
make a go of a brand, all this is only possible
if the brand manager and business management
have enough information at hand that is needed
to make expedient and efficient brand decisions.
It is imperative to not just superficially look
for quick money, but for long-term success. In
order to focus on long-term success the monetary
brand equity has to be known, because only the
knowledge of the monetary brand equity leads to
making success in brand leadership visible,
measurable and interpretable. Has the monetary
brand equity not been determined, it is up to
all involved how they evaluate the result of
brand leadership and which decisions and
activities they deduce from it. Only the
knowledge of brand equity reveals the
contribution the brand makes in regard to yield.
While the contribution of the brand is often
seen in achieving a higher operating margin than
would have been possible without a brand, a
successful brand management today and in the
future requires a more fundamental understanding.
Strictly speaking, brands are a system
for the creation of value geared towards a
sustainable earning power from processing crude
materials all the way to the presentation in a
store. Therefore it is not enough to merely
concede that brand products achieve a higher
sales price, but in fact, brands are independent
corporate assets, just as other corporate assets
which represent a monetary value and
subsequently need to earn interest. A systematic,
reliable and exact analysis of brands and their
monetary value is indispensable. And not just
once, but in regular intervals.
|